I sometimes wonder if `cmd.exe` will ever get the -h treatment a lot of unixy tools have received… `dir` is definitely still living in the MS-DOS era. For example:
T:\>dir v:
Volume in drive V is video
Volume Serial Number is 0254-04EC
Directory of V:\
26/07/2010 09:22 <DIR> .
04/06/2010 09:56 <DIR> ..
26/02/2010 10:41 <DIR> DVD
04/10/2010 13:12 <DIR> TV
22/03/2008 13:41 <DIR> TiVo
26/02/2010 10:41 <DIR> inbound
21/05/2010 09:57 <DIR> redux
12/06/2010 19:40 1,900,601,954 Dance Recital.mp4
1 File(s) 1,900,601,954 bytes
8 Dir(s) 4,612,702,208,000 bytes free
For those that don’t get it, that’s 4.6TiB available. Why not say “4.6TiB”… or even “4.2TB” or at least provide a switch to do so? Most Unixish tools have -h and -H options to do just this. The same file system, but on the file server:
chrisy@baud:~$ df -H /data
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/vmraw-data
8.0T 3.4T 4.6T 42% /data
chrisy@baud:~$ df -h /data
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/vmraw-data
7.3T 3.1T 4.2T 42% /data
The difference between the two being whether it uses 1000 or 1024 as the divisor.